David Shaw wrote:

>>>Some people
>>>will not sign such a user ID though, 
> 
> It's not an issue of improving the trust, it's an issue of
> disambiguation.  

Right, so why is it any better to have a key with:
0x99242560 David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

than to have
0x99242560 David Shaw
0x99242560 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(two UIDs)

You still have the same level of disambiguation.  Why would someone be
unwilling to sign the one, but willing to sign the other?

> Questionable usefulness *in practice*, I said.  In practice, one of
> the major uses for GPG is email, and mail clients tend to look for
> keys by email address.  It's a email client design issue, not a
> cryptographic issue.

Yes, a key without any UID containing an email address is of
questionable usefulness.  Agreed.

> My key has both my name and
> email address, and I don't want people signing just one.

But if they can only prove one part of the data to their satisfaction,
why should they not sign only that part?

> Give a challenge cookie to the person when you meet them, and ask them
> for it in the email challenge.  It proves that the person who is
> responding to your mail is either the physical person you met, or is
> at least in communication with them.

"In communication with them" is not good enough for the level of trust
that these checks imply.  Besides, the scenario I described already
implies that they must be in communication.

But it's really irrelevant to the original point, which is that in many
cases, the real name doesn't matter; only the email address/key does.
"If I know a person only by email, then that email *is* the person to
me."  In that case, if the email is trusted, then the name on the UID is
irrelevant.  I might be willing to trust that key ID 0x99242560 really
is used by the holder of email [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not that the
person in question really is named David Shaw. ... and in most cases, I
probably don't really care about the real name of the keyholder, only
about the email address.  So why should I have to sign both in order to
declare this trust?
-- 
Bad - You get pulled over for doing 90 in a school zone and you're drunk
off your ass again at three in the afternoon.
Worse - The cop is drunk too, and he's a mean drunk.
FUCK! - A mean drunk that's actually a swarm of semi-sentient
flesh-eating beetles.
OpenPGP key id: 0x51192FF2 @ subkeys.pgp.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to