David Shaw wrote: >Known by *you*. I rather think the GD is a good signer, for what it >is.
I think both of you need to make a difference between a bad signer that signs keys without doing sufficient checking, and a signer that spams signatures in quantities that could become a DOS attack. The GD falls in the second category, not in the first. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
