Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
I agree... So if we all understand the need of PKCS#11 in order to access cryptographic tokens, what I don't understand is how come people choose to develop low-level applications in order to work with specific devices?
Neither do I understand that. Werner didn't give a single plausible argument except possibly of license incompatibility. But in my understanding, just incorporating PKCS#11 support into GnuPG would NOT cause license incompatibility. It would happen at run-time if the user chooses to load GPL-incompatible binary PKCS#11 driver (which most of them are).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
