Ruben De Visscher wrote: >I heard that recently, the SHA-1 message digest has been broken.
This is incorrect. However, it appears that SHA-1 is not as strong as its size suggests. >Because GnuPG uses this algorithm to make its digital signatures i >think it would be a good thing to implement a safer digest like SHA-2 >for example. It already does implement the different SHA-2 algorithms. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
