On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 11:22:22AM +0200, Nikita Ronja Gillmann wrote:
> Mikhail transcribed 77K bytes:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:37:49AM +0000, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> > > Yes. The IP DHT underlay implementation is simply not portable.
> > > I just commited a fix to not built it for openbsd.
> >
> > Thank you for fixing the issues! Build is successful, full log is
> > inlined - I got some warnings, maybe they will be interesting to the
> > developers.
>
> The iptables/ip6tables/ip binary tests are just that, warnings.
> There's an unresolved bug which means that one helper binary won't work on
> the *BSDs.
> I've recently picked this back up and as a solution I am translating
> the invocations, which takes some time. As I'm a NetBSD dev it might
> not work fully on OpenBSD, but I try to keep this portable (ipf/ipfw/route in
> mind).
I wasn't clear - I meant compilation warnings, and this strange one:
Updating ./version.texi
MAKEINFO ./gnunet.info
./gnunet.texi:5: warning: unrecognized encoding name `UTF-8'.
