Hey Bastian, thank you very much for your support.
I like to explicitly invite you and everybody who likes to help some how to our monthly GNUnet meeting. This meeting is not exclusively for main developers or even developers at all. Do not expect us to find something for you to do immediately, because that is also a matter of resource allocation. There is enough to do, and we will find something. On 15.11.20 23:25, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote: > If I understand that right, we wouldn't had a problem here, at all, in the > first place, if 3 GNUnet key components on which secushare development highly > depends on, would be just fine: CADET, core and transport. It is mainly transport. For CADET I am quite sure it is working. > And as I got the impression, all these 3 components are in the process of > being revised to fit like that, but that process is a ton of work and > therefore lasts long. We are only rewriting transport at the moment, which is indeed a lot of work. Part of that is making NAT traversal work much better, because sometimes peers have problems getting into the network initially. When we have something in place that is working (means unit test are not failing), we might think of testing this NAT traversal in as many as possible real world scenarios. Cheers t3sserakt
OpenPGP_0x524982A0100F7490.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
