On Friday, December 13, 2019 1:26:23 AM PST ng0 wrote: > I want to be excited about Rust or any more popular new > language but as a package manager through various projects > I have encountered problems which the language package managers > (the ones we would have to rely on) do not solve; the languages > itself do not address and some packaging related problems which > make dealing with all of this as an understatement: problematic.
I've seen and hovered in conversations about this from the MOTU dances. I totally get it and tbh, it'd make more sense to leave that kind of stuff for Rust in their respective managers. > If we ever intend to switch, I would like to carefully (ie maybe > moderated, (not public?,) to avoid bikeshed and a infinite loop > of language X is better than language Y opinions) discuss it. > > I am not against Rust, or Go. The perspective of an application > developer is (usually) focused on other parts than the perspective > of someone who distributes and builds applications in a multi-OS > environment with more than one hardware. Precisely! > Cheers, > ng0 -- - Jacky https://jacky.wtf is where I stay.
