On 11/07/2012 11:10 PM, LRN wrote: > > On 08.11.2012 0:48, SMoratinos wrote: > > You'll have to wait until Grothoff can clarify how > > censorship-resistant namespaces are.
I think once we implement https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=2564 namespace search will be at least as censorship-resistant as the current keyword-based search. The real issue is (as you mention) how to communicate with the namespace owner to get him to update his index. That ought to be rather tricky --- right now, one could publish something under a publicly-known keyword encrypted only for the owner, but that seems somewhat unreliable / inefficient. More importantly, there is no software support for this --- not for encrypting a message to a namespace owner, not for decrypting it, not for really maintaining a large namespace with any decent convenience (LRN: gnunet-fs-gtk has an open bug for you there...). Aside from this, I should mention to SMoratinos that gnunet-java --- while having a pretty complete set of GNUnet APIs --- lacks support for the file-sharing API itself AND we have no plans to fix that at this point (the API itself is just a bit too complex for the envisioned scope of gnunet-java). So while you can do encrypted P2P communication, multicast, DHT, statistics, etc using gnunet-java, accessing our file-sharing functions is still limited to C code. I'm just pointing this out as it might seriously limit your ability to realize your vision. Happy hacking! Christian _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list GNUnet-developers@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
