yes, I know, I understand,
my thoughts are:
1. How do we get tests that are suitable for 'long'?
2. do the current tests hinder improvements?
( suppose an error in the program or e.g. a library has led to a weak reference ... the error is not noticed because the references are not externally checked, corrections / improvements would first be rejected as 'fail' ... )
my thoughts are:
1. How do we get tests that are suitable for 'long'?
2. do the current tests hinder improvements?
( suppose an error in the program or e.g. a library has led to a weak reference ... the error is not noticed because the references are not externally checked, corrections / improvements would first be rejected as 'fail' ... )
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juni 2022 um 23:43 Uhr
Von: "Morten Welinder" <mort...@gnome.org>
An: "newbie nullzwei" <newbie...@gmx.de>
Cc: "Gnumeric Forum" <gnumeric-list@gnome.org>
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: no tests for trigonometric functions? need help / hints how to adapt tests for gnumeric 'long' version,
Von: "Morten Welinder" <mort...@gnome.org>
An: "newbie nullzwei" <newbie...@gmx.de>
Cc: "Gnumeric Forum" <gnumeric-list@gnome.org>
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: no tests for trigonometric functions? need help / hints how to adapt tests for gnumeric 'long' version,
Those reference values are specifically for "double" with round-to-nearest.
M.
M.
_______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list gnumeric-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
