Good morning all,

the discussion of my issues in the french Ubuntu-Forum (which I prefer
for many reasons from the english version, my speaking German not being
one), produced the "solution" to the "missing-functions"-problem.

I still cannot call it a "solution", though, as I am intolerant against
the way, these things are organised.

With my version Gnumeric 1.12.0, that I had compiled from sources
*before* updating Ubuntu from 12.10 to 13.04, came a version of the
libgoffice-0.10 library.

With the update of Ubuntu and Gnumeric, a newer version of libgoffice
was initially *not* installed, because my choice of having my own
version of the library was honored.

I enforced the re-installation and the object files were installed
alright. A test for a "missing symbol" go_linear_solve_multiple
succeeded and the error message that gnumeric produced upon startup was
thus a mystery.

Until I found, that gnumeric 1.12.1 prefers to reference the old library
libgoffice-0.10 rather than the newer. I had to uninstall the old file
and now everything works and all functions are available.

The procedure may be standard and in accordance with no matter which
rule. I still find it ill-adapted. What can I do to keep two versions of
a libarry on my system and have a new version of Gnumeric reference the
one that corresponds ?

TY.
The french discussion is here:
http://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13685531

Michael

On 20.05.2013 23:56, [email protected] wrote:
> Good evening,
> 
> On 18.05.2013 18:40, Andreas Guelzow wrote:
>> So this is an installation problem. Somewhere on your system you should
>> have
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math/plugin.la
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math/plugin.so
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math/plugin.xml
> 
> The XML and the "dynamic" libraries are present for fn-math and also for
> fn-stat but both do not work. The other functions appear to be okay.
> By the way, there is not one statical library found anywhere in the
> plugin-directories.
> 
>> It appears that on your system, Gnumeric can find
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math/plugin.xml
>> since otherwise it would not know that countif even existed and you
>> could not 'activate' the plugin, but Gnumeric fails to find at least one
>> of
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math/plugin.la
>> gnumeric/1.12.1/plugins/fn-math/plugin.so
>>
>> I would suggest you try to reinstall Gnumeric. If that does not help, it
>> should be a distribution (i.e. Ubuntu) issue.
> 
> Thank you, this is my guess, too. The discussion in the Ubuntu-forum
> (fr) is continued and so far we have arrived at verifying the same
> parameters as here. I am curious to read the next comments.
> 
> Cheerio,
> 
> Michael.
> 
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>>
>>> Screen-shot.
>>>
>>> Cheerio,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 23:57 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> Good evening Tim, and good evening List.
>>>>> On 17.05.2013 23:32, Tim Schofield wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it should have read:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =countif(c3:c9,"x");
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I have tried both (and more).
>>>>>
>>>>>> note the comma, not the semicolon. At least that works for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> The result remains the same. Also, if you ignore the semicolon, I really
>>>>> proceded like in my original post. Gnumeric itself should know how to
>>>>> construct the formula. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> In the meantime, I have written two python functions, one for "count in
>>>>> rows" and one fo "count in columns" as the ranges are not comfortable to
>>>>> work with. These functions replace countif, at least in the current 
>>>>> context.
>>>>>
>>>>> As regards the missing countif in 1.12.1, I have posted the question to
>>>>> the french Ubuntu forum. For the time, nobody has really answered in a
>>>>> way which could clarify, if the error is specific to the Ubuntu-package
>>>>> in 13.04.
>>>>>
>>>>> I might try the same in the german and the english forums. Re-installing
>>>>> from the resources of the Linux-distribution has not changed anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good night,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17 May 2013 13:36, <[email protected]
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>     Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     trying to count all occurences of "x" in a line, I chose from the
>>>>>>     function-dropdown "mathematics", then countif and completed the 
>>>>>> formula
>>>>>>     =countif(c3:c9;"x")
>>>>>>     The result is an error "function implementation unavailable". The
>>>>>>     message is translated from the German locale that I use but should be
>>>>>>     all in all identic in English.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I do not ask for a fix, as I am quicker writing the missing function 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>     Python. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Cheerio,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Michael.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>     gnumeric-list mailing list
>>>>>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>     https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>>     Course View Towers,
>>>>>>     Plot 21 Yusuf Lule Road,
>>>>>>     Kampala
>>>>>>     T   +256 (0) 312 314 418
>>>>>>     M +256 (0) 752 963 325
>>>>>>     www.weberpafrica.com
>>>>>>     @TimSchofield2
>>>>>>     Blog: http://weberpafrica.blogspot.co.uk/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gnumeric-list mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnumeric-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
> 

_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list

Reply via email to