Le jeudi 11 août 2011 à 09:39 +0200, Emmanuel Pacaud a écrit : > Hi, > > Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 21:35 +0200, Jean Brefort a écrit : > > > > The second would avoid to depend on librsvg, but I don't know if > > > > Emmanuel will actively support it in the future, even in the near > > > > future. Actually we might also consider importing the mathml code in > > > > goffice. > > > > > > Why would you want to do that ? > > > > Just a possibility if lasem went unmaintained, which might happen as it > > is a one man project. > > Sure it can happen. But by moving the mathml code in goffice, you will > take over the maintainership. Why no keep it in a standalone source > package ? > > > > I think you highly underestimate the difficulty of SVG rendering, shown > > > by the fact that all the modern web browsers fail to have a decent > > > coverage of the SVG 1.1 specification. > > > > I don't underestimate anything. I know it would be a long term issue. > > What I don't get is you have two existing projects, one of them having a > pretty good coverage of the SVG specification (librsvg) and a large user > base, and you would start a new project from scratch. What for ?
EMF support is the priority since it seems that we have no usable alternative. Other format might follow later or not. Jean _______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
