Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 11:28 +0200, Albert Graef a écrit : > Jean Bréfort wrote: > > I'm afraid you might have some license issue. libspreadsheet is GPL-v2 > > only (which is quite unfortunate, see > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463248 for related stuff) > > while your plugin seems to be GPL-v3 > > Oops, thanks for pointing that out. What a mess. :( Well, according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix I should > be able to license the plugin as GPLv2+, and this should make it > possible for ppl to link against both libspreadsheet (GPLv2) and the > Pure runtime (GPLv3+). Is that correct? Or do I need to add an exception > to the Pure license that explicitly allows linking the Pure runtime > against GPLv2 code?
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't give a definitive advice, but as far as I know, GPLv2 is not compatible with GPLv3. Adding an exception to the Pure runtime license might fix the issue for now. I'd like gnumeric to be at least GLPv2 or v3. > > I don't understand why you need gnumeric-config.h > > It was only needed for GETTEXT_PACKAGE, I fixed that now. Thanks. > > > gnumeric-features.h should be enough, and is actually needed since it is > > included from the > > installed numbers.h, please file a bug report. > > Will do. > > Albert > _______________________________________________ gnumeric-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
