> Just in case anyone cares - I'd really like that to be "fixed" - at least
> one of us uses the thing without Gnome proper, and there is a lot of
> gnome beneath the GConf tree.
I run without gnome proper.
As far as I can tell, there is no Gnome stuff underneath gconf besides what is
already needed for gnumeric anyway. Here is my list of stuff to compile before
gconf:
gnome-common gnome-icon-theme glib atk pango libIDL
ORBit2 gnome-xml intltool gtk+
Half of the aren't even gconf dependencies.
So I really don't see the argument for softening the gconf dependency.
Morten
_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
