The URLs are equivalent, use whichever you prefer. The last commit to GnuCash was 17 March so the 18 March Windows build is indeed the latest.
Not only is there no flatpak build since Valentine’s Day, there aren’t any build logs since then. Derek? Regards, John Ralls > On Mar 23, 2025, at 08:18, Bruce Olson via gnucash-user > <gnucash-user@gnucash.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to test the nightly builds for GnuCash Windows and Flatpak. > I see the latest for Windows from 2025-03-18, > gnucash-5.10-2025-03-18-git-5.10-79-g0185a2fec8+.setup.exe, from > https://code.gnucash.org/builds/win32/stable/. I assume this is the latest > build for Windows. > I have two urls for Flatpak, > https://code.gnucash.org/builds/flatpak/stable/?C=M;O=D and > https://code.gnucash.org/builds/flatpak/stable/. The list of builds looks the > same, but the sort order looks different. Which url is correct? Is there a > later build for Flatpak? > > > Thanks, > > Bruce > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
