It is the habit in our household to put all paper receipts in a drawer, and
I have a set time (each week) to enter those transactions (because so much
is done online, I also go through email looking for electronic receipts).
Please note that this is not a hard-and-fast rule; sometimes, I enter
transactions shortly after they occur, if I happen to feel like it.

But I still reconcile with the bank balance (not statement) each month;
yes, I could do it weekly, but monthly is working for me. However, this
helps me to ensure that no one in the household forgot to put a receipt in
the drawer; various ones of us have forgotten (receipts found to have been
languishing in a wallet or purse -- or worse, someone lost a receipt).
Moreover, there are some charges that occur for which I get no notification
-- for example, the Amazon Prime membership, or Amazon's "Subscribe & Save"
items -- those just occur with no notification. A regular reconciliation
helps me to find these things.

Maybe this is not considered an "old-fashioned monthly bank
reconciliation", since I am reconciling to current balance, not to some
statement.


On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 7:54 PM Ken Pyzik <py...@outlook.com> wrote:

> All — First, I want to apologize for the length of this rant.  We will
> always agree to disagree on this subject.  Please understand, I am a
> retired 30 year bank auditor.  I know the purpose of what a reconciliation
> is.  But what I don't understand is this obsession with doing monthly
> reconciliations for personal accounts on your computer.
>
> First, I have not received a "paper" statement from my bank in over 20
> years.  My statements are all online.  Second, I sign-in to my (checking
> and credit card) accounts almost daily.  So I know exactly when every
> deposit or charge hits my accounts.  Third, in this day and age, I write,
> maybe, one check a month, to my landscaper who does not have direct
> deport.  Other than that, my 20-30 transactions per month are all
> electronic.  Also, I charge almost everything on my charge card.  So any
> money I spend is on my charge card statement.
>
> Fourth, I enter transactions in GnuCash whenever I feel I have a few spare
> moments and my GnuCash balances nearly always match my online account
> balances except for when my landscaper takes too long to cash his check, or
> an electronic transaction takes more than a day or two to clear. Fifth, the
> whole purpose of the reconciliation process is to identify transactions
> that you either know to be coming or that you think will be coming that
> have not been reflected on your current bank balance so you don't overdraw
> your account or so that an unauthorized charge does not slip by.
>
> With that backdrop — as you can probably tell,  I have not done an
> old-fashioned monthly bank reconciliation in eons.  Technically, since I
> sign-in almost every day, I guess you can say I do a mini-reconciliation of
> my accounts daily (or almost daily!) and because of that, I know exactly
> what my balance is almost all the time.  Additionally, if I see any unknown
> transaction online (which is like never!), I can call my bank almost
> anytime and discuss with them what the transaction is and usually get it
> rectified rather quickly.  And the benefits of looking at my account
> everyday is that I can see it hit that day!
>
> So, with all that being said, can someone please explain to me why people
> are wasting their time doing manual C/N reconciliations on a bunch of
> transactions on their computer?  I would think they could use their time
> much more effectively doing something else.  You see, the reason for
> reconciliations in the past were that you did not have the access, as you
> do today, to go and see exactly what the balance is or what transactions
> have cleared in your account, anytime, anywhere, 24-hours a day!
>
> Reconciliations are vital for a business so they have documented proof of
> their transactions.  Also, they sometimes are required by government
> regulations or company policies.  So I get their need in the business
> world.  But reconciliations for your personal accounts are a thing of the
> past.  In this day and age, transactions clear pretty quickly.  The longest
> it takes for a transaction to clear is usually a manual check - and that's
> only dependent on how long it takes for someone to deposit it into their
> account.  Hell, I have had some transactions clear in as quick as 10
> seconds (for internal transfers or internal payments to a bank CC).
>
> Again — there will be many who will totally disagree with me, and that's
> OK, but I still don't see the reason for a monthly reconciliation process
> to true up your personal accounts.  Waiting until you get a statement in 30
> days to see if your GNUCash balance matches the bank is crazy to me when I
> can see it and balance it every day!
>
> In the end - I guess my 1 minute per day is probably someone else's 30
> minutes at the end of the month or whenever they get their electronic
> statement.   But in today's electronic banking environment, why would
> someone wait 30 days to get a statement from the bank to  reconcile their
> personal accounts, when they can see the balance on their own, any day and
> anytime and balance it daily?  Seems counter-intuitive and
> counter-productive to me.  But I guess that's just my preference.
>
> Ken
>
> PS - by the way — this is also exactly why banks charge for paper monthly
> statements now.  They are required by law to give you a statement - but if
> you want it on paper - they are allowed to charge for that paper since it
> is available electronically all the time - everyday after they generate it.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: gnucash-user <gnucash-user-bounces+pyz01=outlook....@gnucash.org>
> on behalf of Jim DeLaHunt <list+gnuc...@jdlh.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2025 4:56 PM
> To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org <gnucash-user@gnucash.org>
> Subject: Re: [GNC] what is best reconcile/update procedure?
>
> Arthur:
>
> On 2025-01-18 13:06, arthur brogard via gnucash-user wrote:
> > i just keep personal books for the family.
> > my update and reconcile procedure works but is a bit tedious.  I can't
> think of any better way and I doubt there is one but i thought it might be
> good to ask.
> > At sort of almost random times I decide to update the books.  So I
> download from CBA transactions from the bank accounts.
> > then I put them in a spreadsheet.  in date order.
> > then I inspect and compare with a transaction report from gnu cash - one
> for each account - and identify transactions not yet in gnu cash.
> > delete all but those from the spreadsheet.
> > sort on description.
> > attach a fourth column for target account.
> > import to gnu cash.
> > that's the update
> > balances should agree.  that's the reconcile.
> > all that downloading, spreadsheeting, sorting blah, blah.....  any
> better way or that's just it?
>
> Are you familiar with the Reconciliation feature of GnuCash?
>
> It is described in sections 2.9.4. Reconciliation and 5.4. Reconciling
> Your Accounts of the GnuCash Tutorial and Guide
> <https://gnucash.org/viewdoc.phtml?rev=5&lang=C&doc=guide>, as well as
> sections 4.5. Reconcile Window and 5.8. Reconciling an Account to a
> Statement of the GnuCash Manual
> <https://gnucash.org/viewdoc.phtml?rev=5&lang=C&doc=help>.
>
> I won't repeat all of that here.
>
> I collect receipts or emails for all transactions. Every week or so, I
> go through them and enter all transactions. When the statement arrives,
> it is usually in the form of a PDF file from my bank or credit card
> company. I hope the statement in one window on my computer. I open
> GnuCash, and the tab for that account, in another window. I push the
> Reconcile button to start the process, and confirm that starting and
> ending balances for the statement. The Reconcile Window appears. The
> Reconcile Window has an entry for each unreconciled transaction in that
> account. Next to each entry is an unchecked checkbox.
>
> I hold a pencil or pointer next to each line of the statement, in the
> one window, in turn. For each line of the statement, I find the
> corresponding transaction in the Reconcile Window. I check the checkbox.
> Sometimes I need to add or correct a transaction. For that, I go to the
> account's register window, and make the change. The result appears
> immediately in the Reconcile Window. Then I check the checkbox, and move
> my pointer to the next line of the statement.
>
> When I have gone through the statement, the Reconcile Window should have
> an Difference value of zero in the bottom-right corner. I click the
> Finish button. The Reconcile Window disappears. I close the window with
> the statement PDF.
>
>  From your description of downloading transactions, putting them in a
> spreadsheet, and deleting from the spreadsheet, it sounds like you are
> reproducing in a less convenient way what the Reconcile feature already
> gives you.  Or maybe you are importing transactions — but that is not
> reconciliation, that is data entry.
>
> Does this help? Best regards,
>        —Jim DeLaHunt
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>


-- 
_________________________________
Richard Losey
rlo...@gmail.com
Micah 6:8
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to