That is a great explanation! And I really like Jane Bryant Quinn's book. It was good reading through that and getting an understanding. I think I need to reread it again and ask my wife to read it so we are both on the same page. I've tried Wade Pfau's book a few times, but that is too in depth for me. I'll take a closer look at guardrails.

I was fortunate enough to work in the computing and networking department of a large company. Our group was sold off to a larger company that just does IT and had a networking group. That group I was in was then sold to a large networking company. So I receive social security. My wife receives social security. And I opted for a pension rather than a cash buyout from each company, so have three pensions coming in. But I need to pay attention to money that was in my 401K that I rolled over to an IRA. The 4% rule sounds nice, but it leaves me very uncomfortable. My wife has a progressive neurological disease. If I go first she will need to be in assisted living with skilled nursing care, and that can eat up an IRA very quickly.

I like to think we'll be okay taking out 4% adjusted for inflation, but the reality is that if my health fails things will get real expensive real quick. If my wife's health fails more than I am able to provide care for, the same thing happens. And if both of our health fails, we'll need all of that IRA and then some. My wife can't get life insurance or long term care insurance, but I carry a life insurance policy on myself to help offset costs for my wife if I go first.

I know this is not GnuCash talk. But at the very least I can say that I will mark my IRA withdrawals as distribution so I can make sure I stay at a set amount and can quickly search transactions to see where I am. I think putting in guardrails will be an excellent step in making sure we're okay. As would dropping down lower than 4% to make sure a little extra money is there when we hit our 80's,


On 10/6/24 14:10, Stan Brown (using GC 4.14) wrote:
This may not be relevant to GnuCash, but I'm a retiree too, and
strategies for retirement spending are certainly interesting to me. I'm
not a financial professional, nor was I one before retirement, but I've
done a lot of reading over the past 10 years and will be happy to
exchange knowledge, which we can each take with a pinch of salt.

I've written some initial thoughts below. If this is too off topic for
the mailing list, feel free to email me off list if you want to talk
more about this. (That's not just for Bruce, but for anyone interested.)

On 2024-10-06 09:56, Bruce Griffis wrote:
So I also misunderstood the 4% rule. I figured I would calculate it as I
can take out 4% of my investments in 2024, then in 2025 take out 4%
based on what I had in my portfolio as of 1/1/2025. And I misunderstood
Maybe you were confused because that's actually how the Required Minimum
Distribution from an IRA works.(*) Each calendar year you must withdraw
a certain fraction of the balance in your IRA at the end of the previous
year. In 2024 you withdraw that fraction of your balance on 2023-12-31,
in 2025 the fraction of your balance on 2024-12-31, and so on. The
"certain fraction" is in the mortality tables in Publication 590-B.

(*) I assume you're in the US.

But that's how much you must withdraw from your IRA, and what you
actually need to spend may well be different. The IRS tables are
designed to have the average person draw their account down to zero
before they die. To accomplish this, the withdrawal amounts are
typically above the 4% level, and the percentages increase as you age.

it. I recalculated based on 4% of what was in investments on the day I
retired, then checked inflation rate (2.5% on August 2024 - I would need
to check again at the end of the year) - and compared it to 4% of what I
have in my portfolio today - and there was over a 2K difference in
calculations. I could have taken out too much.
This sounds like the strategy in many books, such as Jane Bryant Quinn's
excellent /How to Make Your Money Last/. The idea is you look at your
total portfolio (not just IRA) when you retire, and spend no more than
4% in the following year. Each year after that your spending limit is
the same number of dollars, adjusted for the year's inflation, not the
same percentage. If you stick with this plan, conventional wisdom
(backed up by some computer analyses) is that you have a very good
chance of not running out of money before you die.

If the amount you must withdraw from your IRA for your Required Minimum
Distribution exceeds your spending limit for the year, you don't spend
the excess but plow it back into investments. (You can't put it back
into a traditional IRA, nor into a Roth IRA.)

Quinn discusses how you can determine whether the right starting number
is 4%, 4½%, or something else.

But this strategy has a couple of vulnerabilities. For one, what if your
portfolio really tanks one year? Since this strategy does not take
investment performance into account, spending on your regular schedule
could dangerously drain your assets, locking in losses. Then when the
portfolio rises again, the shares you liquidated are gone, so your
assets don't recover as much as they would have if you'd cut back on
spending.

One solution for this is to add "guardrails" to the basic strategy. Do a
google search for "guardrails retirement withdrawal" (without quotes),
or begin at
<https://www.cnbc.com/select/guardrails-approach-retirement-withdrawal-strategy-how-it-works/>.


So, note to self. Each year check what was in investments on date of
retirement. Check inflation rate. Recalculate safe withdrawal amount.
What matters in year N is not what your portfolio was at retirement, but
rather what your spending limit was in year N-1, and the year's
inflation. Your portfolio's _current_ value will be relevant, if you add
a guardrail strategy, but the historical value at retirement isn't part
of the calculations.

Now I need to go back and read up on what to do in years three, four,
five, ... - I only know what to do in years one (4%) and two (4% plus
annual inflation rate).
Suppose you retire with $1,000,000. In year 1, you will spend up to 4%
of your portfolio, which is $40,000. Suppose the year's inflation is 8%.
Then in year 2 you will spend $40,000 + 8%, which is $40,000 + 3200 =
$43,200. In year 3, supposing inflation was 2%, you will spend up to
$43,200 + 2% = $43,200 + 864 = $44,064. And so forth.

If that seems too simple, that's because it is. Especially in the early
years of retirement, if your portfolio has a real crash one year,
robotically sticking to last-year's-spending-plus-inflation can prevent
you from making a full recovery when your investments rise again. That's
where guardrails come in. They do complicate the calculations a bit, but
a basic spreadsheet will take care of that.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to