I'm fine with either, but I don't want the styles mixed: THAT is hard to read.
_________________________________ Richard Losey rlo...@gmail.com Micah 6:8 On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 8:34 PM William Prescott <w...@theprescotts.com> wrote: > Just to be a devil's advocate... > The advantage of top posting is that the new addition to the thread is > obvious. With bottom posting, the new reply appears in the middle of the > message, often with text both above and below it. > > Probably because of the default behavior of many email clients, most email > chains I see are top posted. This forum is the only place where I commonly > see bottom posting. > > To quote from Wikipedia on the subject: > "For a long time the traditional style was to post the answer below as > much of the quoted original as was necessary to understand the reply > (bottom or inline). Many years later, when email became widespread in > business communication, it became a widespread practice to reply above the > entire original and leave it (supposedly untouched) below the reply. > While each online community < > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_community> differs on which styles > are appropriate or acceptable, within some communities the use of the > "wrong" method risks being seen as a breach of netiquette < > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette>, and can provoke vehement > response from community regulars." > > > Personally, I'm neutral. Either is fine with me. > > Will > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
