Hello all. I have been working for a while on implementing a "Running Total" feature in the transaction report. That would be a feature where running totals are calculated based on report transaction sort order as shown, so you could combine any transaction in any groups and sort order and still get a running total (or subtotals) that would match the existing total/subtotals on the last transaction. See attached screenshot for an example where all 3 levels of running totals are presented (in practice each level can be turned on or off to reduce clutter).
Hence this feature is different from the existing Running Balance which gives you the running balance for the underlying accounts (and therefore assumes the report is sorted by account and register order), while also showing a balance forward (which the running totals won't do). If anybody is interested in having such a feature, please look at what I have done so far and give some feedback as to what sort of improvements you would like to see or issues you think might arise with the draft implementation so far, or even whether (and why) this is not a worthwhile feature at all. Best would be to leave comments either on the "bug/enhancement" report or the Pull request (because they are easier to access in the long term) but the mailing list is OK as well. This is a work in progress and all comments, whether in support or criticism, are welcome. Also there is no rush to implement this, so comments can come any time. More information on the origin of this feature in the bug/enhancement report: https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=798879 Actual presentation of what was done so far and screenshots are in the draft Pull Request: https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/pull/1617 Sincerely, Vincent Dawans
_______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
