Hi Simon,

I appreciate that perspective. 

I have considered only only assigning only top level types, because if someone 
is importing 25 or 30 accounts (INCOME/EXPENSES types should be much easier for 
most users), going through and editing them isn’t that difficult.

But as I said earlier, the challenge of getting them right the first time is 
intriguing. :-)

Tim 

> On Feb 20, 2023, at 21:52, Simon Roberts <si...@dancingcloudservices.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> FWIW, I have taken the perspective that if I don't know what
> category/account to put something in, I don't guess, I put it in
> "Unbalanced" and then ask someone who knows. As I understand it, there
> shouldn't be anything in that category, so it's a big red flag that you
> can't miss that this thing needs attention. Then at suitable intervals, you
> can ask your accountant, and learn. If you make a guess and get it wrong,
> there's no obvious way, other than a really thoughtful audit, questioning
> essentially everything, that will reliably catch all the erroneous guesses.
> 
> Just my two cents, of course, since I'm not an accountant either
> (presumably if I were, I'd not be suffering from these uncertainties!)
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:55 PM David Cousens <davidcousen...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Tim ,
>> 
>> In most cases if you get an account type wrong you can edit the account
>> type and
>> its parent account from the account tree structure. There may be some
>> limitations associated with the type of the parent account which may have
>> to be
>> worked around. In the worst case scenario you can create an account of the
>> correct type and then delete the account of the wrong type. If there are
>> transactions to the account you are deleting the dialogue will ask which
>> account
>> you wish them transferred to and here you specify the new account of the
>> correct
>> type. Apart from the basic top level account types Asset, Liability,
>> Equity,
>> Income and Expenses there are a number of account sub-types which are
>> usually
>> tied to aspects of the business features, stock trading etc
>> 
>> David Cousens
>> 
>>> On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 19:25 -0600, m...@tgr66.me wrote:
>>> Thanks Jim for the reply.
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 20, 2023, at 15:49, Jim DeLaHunt <list+gnuc...@jdlh.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It sounds like you are trying to answer two questions:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. How do you extract meaning from account name strings in incoming
>>>> migration data, such that you can pick the appropriate GnuCash account
>> type?
>>> 
>>> Ummm, sort of. Yes, I am asking myself that because I have to make
>> decisions.
>>> But I was really providing the scenarios to help shape the reader's
>> thinking
>>> about the implications.
>>> 
>>> Yes, the question I’m asking is in the subject line. I should have
>> included it
>>> more in the body. I did ask specifically in the body though if there was
>> "any
>>> negative implications of assigning too general of an account type to an
>>> account?” I’m inclined to err on the side of general and tell the user
>> they
>>> need to review all of them and edit appropriately based on GnuCash’s
>>> documentation. But, it is still a good challenge to get them as close to
>> right
>>> as possible.
>>> 
>>> The decisions I’m making are naturally heavily influenced by my personal
>>> account and categories structure in Quicken along with my understanding
>> about
>>> how GnuCash structures accounts and defines types. There are undoubtedly
>>> members of this mailing list who migrated data from some other app to
>> GnuCash.
>>> They made decisions about account types, perhaps after creating their
>> chart of
>>> accounts, and they may have found adjustments were necessary because
>> something
>>> didn’t work as expected. I believe hearing that would be helpful to me
>> and
>>> others.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2. What are the GnuCash account types, and what are their meanings (or,
>>>> purposes, or semantics)?
>>>> 
>>>> I think question 1 is up to you. It is not a GnuCash question.
>>>> 
>>>> The place to start for question 2 is the GnuCash /Help/ documentation,
>> 5.1.
>>>> *Types of GnuCash Accounts*[1]. You might find it helpful to consult
>> the
>>>> notes about what kinds of child account type each parent account type
>>>> accepts.  Missing from this page is the Trading Account type.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I had read
>>> 
>> https://code.gnucash.org/docs/MAINT/group__Account.html#ga398c5d6f7a5127db7b81789e05262908
>>> <
>>> 
>> https://code.gnucash.org/docs/MAINT/group__Account.html#ga398c5d6f7a5127db7b81789e05262908
>>>> but will make sure to go back and read section 5.1. I appreciate that
>> you’ve
>>> highlighted that there can be child-parent mismatches as that is a real
>>> implication. I realize that if a user migrating to GnuCash using the
>> tool I’m
>>> developing had a Credit Card under an Asset account, they could
>> potentially
>>> have a problem. I’m using PieCash for my GnuCash writes, and I *think* it
>>> checks the parent-child rules, but I might want to test that.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Trading accounts are described in the GnuCash /Tutorial and Concepts
>> Guide/,
>>>> 12.3. *Automatically Recording Currency Transactions using Trading
>>>> Accounts*[2], and at wiki page *Trading Accounts*[3].
>>>> 
>>>> You might have to resort to reading the GnuCash code[4] to answer more
>>>> detailed questions. I remember doing this once to clear up some of my
>> own
>>>> questions.
>>>> 
>>>> Your subject: line asks, "what are the implications of getting [Account
>>>> Types] wrong?" I don't see you asking that in your message body. But
>> as far
>>>> as I know, the implication can be unusability if you get the account
>> type
>>>> very wrong (e.g. an Asset type for what should be an Expense type
>> account),
>>>> or inconvenience if you get the account type a little wrong (e.g. no
>> option
>>>> to add an interest payment during the reconciliation process if you
>> assign a
>>>> Liability type for what should be a Credit type account). Note that
>> users
>>>> can, within limits, change account types for a book which is in use.
>> That
>>>> limits the negative implications of migration software making the wrong
>>>> choice of account type.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Great comments. Thank you. I did notice oddities yesterday when I
>> created a
>>> new book (GnuCash->File-New File) and created a full chart of accounts.
>> In
>>> particular, in Investments. Under Retirement, Bond accounts have a type
>> of
>>> Stock, so they have Shares/Buy/Sell, etc columns in the register. So
>> those
>>> look okay (other than calling a Bond a Stock type, which feels odd to
>> me). But
>>> as far as implications, I don’t see any issue. However, I realized this
>>> partially answers the question about implications of opting general vice
>>> specific. And this is reflected, I think, in GnuCash’s default account
>>> structure and types.
>>> 
>>> In the Bond, Market Index, Mutual Fund and Stock accounts under Brokerage
>>> Account are all type Asset while the latter is Bank. So I’m guessing the
>> logic
>>> here is that *most* brokerage accounts have an associated sweep or bank
>>> account. But, Brokerage Account is a Placeholder so I didn’t think
>>> transactions would be recorded there. Admittedly, I may misunderstand so
>> I’ll
>>> need to experiment. I do see that Buy/Fee/Sell show up as Actions in one
>> of
>>> those registers.
>>> 
>>> My app’s logic today would assign the type Stock to an account with the
>> word
>>> “brokerage” included. I’m now questioning this based on GnuCash’s default
>>> setup.
>>> 
>>> So specifically, why does GnuCash’s default chart of accounts have the
>>> brokerage accounts as Assets while the retirement accounts are either
>> Stock or
>>> Mutual Fund?
>>> 
>>> Thank you again.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>>> You are welcome to pose more specific questions to this list, if you
>> like.
>>>> 
>>>> And, while reading the documentation you may come up with suggestions
>> for
>>>> improved documentation wording. I encourage you to propose those as
>> pull
>>>> requests, or to the gnucash-dev mailing list. Part of what makes
>> GnuCash so
>>>> good is that many hands help to improve it.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>     —Jim DeLaHunt
>>>> 
>>>> [1] <https://www.gnucash.org/viewdoc.phtml?rev=4&lang=C&doc=help>,
>>>> temporarily hosted at
>>>> <https://code.gnucash.org/website/viewdoc.phtml?rev=4&lang=C&doc=help>
>> while
>>>> www.gnucash.org's web server is offline.
>>>> 
>>>> [2]
>>>> <
>> https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v4/C/gnucash-guide/currency_trading_accts.html
>>>>> , temporarily
>>>> <
>> https://code.gnucash.org/website/docs/v4/C/gnucash-guide/currency_trading_a
>>>> ccts.html>
>>>> 
>>>> [3] <https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Trading_Accounts>
>>>> 
>>>> [4] <https://github.com/GnuCash/gnucash>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gnucash-user mailing list
>>>> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
>>>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>>>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>>>> -----
>>>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>>>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>>> 
>>>> On 2023-02-19 05:32, m...@tgr66.me wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The approach I’m taking in a migration app I’m writing will be
>>>>> conservative, erring on the side of more general vice more specific.
>> For
>>>>> example, ASSET, LIABILITY, INCOME, EXPENSE, EQUITY are pretty easy to
>>>>> accurately apply based on account names (for example, “assets:current
>>>>> assets:cash”). In an initial round of type assignments, this account
>> would
>>>>> get ASSET as its type. In a deeper subsequent look, it should be
>>>>> reassigned with a type of CASH.
>>>>> 
>>>>> INCOME, EXPENSE and EQUITY types don’t have sub-types I see, so
>> those will
>>>>> be even easier. I don’t foresee any issues with those.
>>>>> 
>>>>> LIABILITY and CREDIT don’t appear too difficult as there just aren’t
>> that
>>>>> many options. First I’ll assign LIABILITY and if the words “credit
>> card”
>>>>> or “credit cards” exist in the rest of the account path, I’ll switch
>> to
>>>>> CREDIT, otherwise, leave it alone.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Assets and Investments will be the trickiest. Let me start with
>> Assets
>>>>> first.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Assume an imported account has the path and name of
>> “assets:savings:family
>>>>> savings”. Getting this typed as an ASSET is pretty straightforward.
>>>>> Ideally, however, it would be typed as BANK.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Or SHOULD it? Perhaps this family puts its savings in old coffee cans
>>>>> under the back porch. So, I’d be inclined to leave this as ASSET.
>> The user
>>>>> can change it, but are there any negative implications of assigning
>> too
>>>>> general of an account type to an account?
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, if the name has the word “account” in it, well, then I’d be
>>>>> confident assigning a type of BANK.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Investment accounts will be the trickiest I believe. Heck, I’m not
>> sure I
>>>>> understand the differences.
>>>>> 
>>>>> When I create a new account in GnuCash, I’m surprised at some of the
>>>>> assignments made when creating the hierarchy. For example,
>>>>> “Assets:Investments:Brokerage Account” is a placeholder with type of
>> BANK.
>>>>> I would be inclined to assign any placeholder accounts a more generic
>>>>> type. In this case, ASSET. Again, are there any negative
>> implications of
>>>>> me taking this approach?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regardless, I will direct the user to review all of them once
>> created in
>>>>> GnuCash to ensure they align with their exceptions, but are there
>>>>> consequences if I get them wrong?
>>>>> 
>>>>> And finally, TRADING. I don’t see any of those in the initial
>> account list
>>>>> created when I make a new file. So, for now, I’ll ignore this. Is
>> that
>>>>> okay?
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gnucash-user mailing list
>>> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
>>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>>> -----
>>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-user mailing list
>> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>> -----
>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Simon Roberts
> (303) 249 3613
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to