The problem with advertising 'inclusive' sales tax is, except in limited circumstances, usually impossible. This is because in many jurisdictions, there are taxes that scale with the amount of the total purchase, or on the day of the purchase (tax holidays anyone?) or even who the buyer is, (exempt, partially?) or where they 'live'. (some taxes charged at point of sale, others the rate is based on the point of delivery)

Sales Taxes here are enough of a nightmare precisely because courts have allowed this mess and not forced everything to be 'point of sale'. Having to include them in pricing is practically impossible in many, many cases.

From the perspective of someone who's worked in both the business end of retail and service sectors, I'd give a big thumbs down to inclusive pricing being a requirement. It can be done in a few limited cases, but certainly not universally.

Regards,
Adrien

On 10/17/22 2:37 PM, Stan Brown wrote:
I'll mention in passing that I _wish_ it were compulsory here to
advertise the actual total price including sales tax and other taxes.
That is usual for gasoline (petrol) here in the US, but as industry
practice rather than by regulation. However, just about every other
product is advertised with a base price excluding sales tax. To make it
worse, many products -- air fares, hotel rates, and cable, Internet, and
telephone, to name just a few -- advertise an attractive low price but
then charge "fees" that add a substantial increment to the advertised
price. Such deceptive practice is unfortunately quite legal here in
California, and in every other state as far as I'm aware.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to