When I changed the account depth to "all", the zero entries (which are stocks) went away. But, that makes the report harder to read. Seems like a bug to me.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 1:56 PM john <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > > > > On Aug 13, 2022, at 7:54 AM, Michael Hendry <hendry.mich...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On 13 Aug 2022, at 14:08, Fred Tydeman <tydeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I am running Linux and GnuCash 4.11 > >> I do an Account Summary report. > >> I have set the options to not show zero balances. > >> Yet, the report shows many zero balances. > >> The attached screen shot shows part of the report > >> along with the options. > >> <Screenshot from 2022-08-13 > 09-01-37.png>_______________________________________________ > >> gnucash-user mailing list > >> gnucash-user@gnucash.org > >> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > >> ----- > >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > > > I’ve just tried this, and when I untick “Include accounts with zero > total balances” and tick “Omit zero balance figures” I get the desired > output. > > > > Did you remember to hit the “Apply” button after changing these > tick-boxes? > > That's not it, you can see that the apply button is greyed out in the > screenshot. > > The report is summarizing all of the commodities held in some parent > account including the zero balance ones. I'm not sure if that's a bug or a > feature, but to get the display I think you want go to the Accounts tab of > the report options dialog and increase the account depth so that the > individual commodity accounts are displayed. > > Regards, > John Ralls > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
