There's no shortcut to finding out why you are out of balance. There are
'math tricks' however to guide you. For example, if the unbalanced
amount ends with a '9' there is a decent probability you transposed
digits somewhere.
Un-reconciling doesn't delete anything. I'm not sure what you are
describing there.
Un-reconciling simply is removing the 'y' ("yes") flag in the 'r'
("reconciled?") column and changing it to 'n' ("no").
It doesn't affect any balances. The flag is just for you to know that
you have verified the transaction is correct and matches a statement
from your financial institution.
Un-reconciling then, will mark the transaction as 'unverified'. You can
filter your register view to show only un-reconciled transactions so you
can then do research and find out why it doesn't match, or in fact if it
does, then mark it as reconciled.
If ALL transactions are reconciled that doesn't mean your balances are
0.00, it just means that whatever the balance happens to be, you have
verified it to be correct.
Regards,
Adrien
On 12/24/21 9:07 AM, Mahon Finbar wrote:
Happy Holidays,
Not wanting to ruin your festivities, but where is the best place to
find help, and advice on rectifying reconciliations.
Is see there is a way to "unreconcile" a selection, but I don't
understand what the effect is or why to do it. For example I can maybe
unreconcile to create 0.00 as the overall result but the transactions
are still there!!
My issue is that somewhere along the line since 1.1.2013 when I started
Gnu something has gone wrong, things seemed to be OK and because I was
lax in doing reconciles I fell off the 0.00.....
I there a way to find the anomaly?
Finbar
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.