This is not really a GnuCash problem - as far as the program is concerned, you can have as many instances of 1111 as you like. So it depends on how you use the number. If you write a, b, c etc beside the number when they get used, and you either get them or their images returned, you can match them up when you reconcile. If you rely on the bank to report the number either online or on a statement, it will use whatever is in the MICR, and you can’t change that. But as far as the software is concerned, it doesn’t matter.
> On Dec 2, 2021, at 4:34 AM, Jeff <beastmaster...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I never encountered this in any of my accounting practice before. My wife's > personal business ran out of checks, so until the new ones arrived all of the > banks desk checks are numbered 1111. Check number 1111 already exists as a > valid check number some years ago. > > Should all of the temporary numbered check numbers be entered as 1111 or > 1111a, 1111b, etc in GNC? > > -- > --JEffrey Black M.B.A. > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
