> On Mar 8, 2021, at 2:37 AM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> wrote:
>
> Hmm, my mail client insists on munging part of my original message on re-
> sending, so here's a manually edited one with my full comment...
>
> Op zondag 7 maart 2021 20:39:00 CET schreef John Ralls:
>> Not offhand, but it's quite possible that adding symbol fixes the problem.
>> Did you try gnc-fq-helper, and if so what was its output?
>>
> On a tangent, why does gnucash require a symbol key ? The full hash keys also
> have the symbol name, albeit in a weird format that can be converted into a
> proper two-dimensional hash without too much trouble. I'm doing that in my
> work in progress branch:
> https://github.com/gjanssens/gnucash/blob/
> c847fa3aa4a5f90fa4dbf93673d3668e9ddc9e22/libgnucash/quotes/finance-quote-
> wrapper.in#L107
>
> What would be the potential issues if we decided to make the symbol key
> optional, assuming we also fix the code to use the symbol part of the hash
> keys of course ?
gnc-fq-helper already does do that, see
https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/blob/maint/libgnucash/quotes/gnc-fq-helper.in#L241.
I guess we should remove the warning from gnc-fq-dump, it seems to be
misleading.
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
