Mike, This is already a long standing request, both in bugzilla and uservoice. See my other message on this thread for details.
David T. -------- Original Message -------- From: Mike Brady <mikee.bu...@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Sun Feb 28 15:22:23 EST 2021 To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org Subject: Re: [GNC] Moving Log Location I understand the points about moving the main file into its own folder and letting all the logs and versions build up there. It would be helpful, though, for Gnucash to offer the option to dedicate a separate backup or logs directory for logs and versions. Guess I could submit that as a feature request, though I'm sure it's come up before and has not been done for reasons. In the meantime, it looks like the only way to keep a clean directory for my main "project" is to move the Gnucash data file to its own directory, and put a shortcut to it in my main directory. I'm not complaining about Gnucash generating all that file traffic. It's helped a couple of times when recovering from (personally-induced, while getting the initial setup and the first couple of months right for me) errors. Only mildly grumbling about how it seems impossible to separate it from the main data file. Mike Brady _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
