> On Jan 5, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Jürgen Jatzkowski <j...@patagonics.de> wrote:
> 
> I'm using Gnucash on two Macs (both running BigSur 11.1 and the same version 
> of GNC):
> 
> Gnucash Version: 4.2
> Build ID: 4.2+(2020-09-26)
> Finance::Quote: -
> 
> Recently I updated (using brew) and noticed that the report "balance sheet - 
> eguile version" (I think it is stored as balsheet-eg.scm in the Gnucash app 
> folder) differs on both machines. Unfortunately one of the host renders the 
> report in a not-so-good-to-read font.
> 
> Now I did some research and tried to understand the root cause for this 
> behaviour. After some hours struggling now I think it is time to ask here for 
> some help. Changing the font family in the options dialog didn't help - I was 
> not able to change the rendering. No matter which value I enter for the font 
> family it doesn't change. Changing the font size works pretty well.
> 
> Any hint or help is highly appreciated :)

The Homebrew recipe just downloads our Gnucash-Intel-4.x.dmg. You can prove 
that to yourself by running
 spctl --assess -vv /Applications/Gnucash.app
in Terminal. You might want to do that anyway because if something's gotten 
corrupted on either machine that will tell you.

Are both machines running 4.2? Have you assigned the same stylesheet to the 
report on both machines? Do you have any customizations on either?

Perhaps a screenshot of each report would be helpful; it's hard to make useful 
comments based only on "one of them looks ugly". Remember to attach the 
screenshots to the very bottom of your reply so that the list server doesn't 
discard them.

Regards,
John Ralls


_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to