GTI, What has this or the debian.community/fsfellowship.eu conspiracy theory to do with GnuCash?
Regards, John Ralls > On Aug 21, 2020, at 7:02 AM, GTI .H <gti90...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > De: Debian Community News Team <team@debian.community> > Date: qui., 20 de ago. de 2020 às 15:47 > Subject: FSFE into Berlin bunker > To: *** <***@lists.***.org> > > > Fragile? > > > https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/2020-August/thread.html > > https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/2020-August/013113.html > > https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/2020-August/013114.html > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: Black Ribbon Day & FSFEGoogle > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:00:33 +0200 (CEST) > From: Garfield Europe <garfi...@tutanota.de> > Reply-To: discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu > To: Discussion <discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu>, Discussion > <discuss...@lists.fsfe.org> > > > Somebody did all this while I was sleeping? > > Great work! > -- > /The cat formerly known as Garfield/ > > Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox: > https://tutanota.com > > > > Aug 18, 2020, 08:27 by team@debian.community: > > > > On 18/08/2020 09:57, Johann Gross wrote: > > How can you write such stupid text in the name of the > fellowship? I am > also member of the fellowship but I do not agree with what you > write. > > > Thank you for your feedback. This mailing list welcomes multiple > opinions. > > Can a blog be stupid and true at the same time? > > We are happy to be stupid if it helps people use the opportunity to > understand what TOTALITARIANISM really means. > > Fact: Fellows were never allowed to nominate for president or attend the > annual meeting of FSFE. Is that more like democracy or dictatorship? > > Even if it is stupid, which point from the blog is /not/ based on fact? > > - Gemlich letter (1919) and FSFE minutes (2019) both spread defamation > > - Nazis stole artworks, FSFE are stealing RMS's trademark (see below, > "the framework agreement, as it stands, is not being honored from > any side") > > - Nazis and FSFE claim and pretends to speak for all Europe > > - Nazis and FSFE both cancelled elections > > - Nazis and FSFE both censored political opponents > > - Nazis and FSFE both made experiments on people (look at how they > brainwashed somebody after 34C3, more details to come) > > - when Nazis and FSFE can't control somebody, they try to make them > completely disappear > > > Nobody says that FSFE == Nazi Party. This is just a feature comparison > that is disturbingly accurate. > > You really have severe mental problems > > > What about volunteers who work for Google(=FSFE) without getting paid? > Most people find that behavior odd. > > > https://fsfellowship.eu/matthias-kirschner-fsfe-nazi-comparisons/ > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: FSF asking us to change our name II > Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:31:39 +0200 > From: Jonas Oberg <jo...@fsfe.org> > To: Bernhard Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> > CC: g...@fsfeurope.org > > Hi Bernhard, > > I largely agree with you, but I would like to ask for a clarification on > this part: > > I don't see why. We should ask them to establish the agreed > cooperation. > > > If I take an honest look at the framework agreement, I believe it's > phrased rather favourable towards the FSF, and a lot of what we would > like to see -- such as joint decision making on important issues related > to Free Software -- isn't actually in the agreement aside from an intent > to develop such a way in some hypothetical future. > > And I can truly see why the FSF believes we are in violation of the > agreement, at least on parts. Our work on the Radio Directive and other > policy work I believe is an example of work that according to the > agreement should be carried out by the FSF, and not the FSFE. > > Our work on standards for cloud services is close to what's reserved for > the FSF. On the other part, there are a number of activities envisioned > from the FSFE which we don't do, or never did: operate the GNU Business > Network, develop new free software, translate FSF position papers, > recruit more volunteers for the GNU project, resell FSF merchandise, > and so on. > > So the framework agreement, as it stands, is not being honored from > any side. What I understand from you is that you think we can push > more on this: > > We intend, in the > future, after we have gained experience working together, to develop a > system wherein these decisions are approved jointly by a specific list > of several major FSFs. > > Essentially, our message could be that now, after 15 years, we have the > experience of working together. It's not been a pleasurable experience, > but we now know what the current tensions and activities are, which > makes > this a good time to now negotiate what such a system for join decision > making would look like. > > Is that close to what you intend? > > > Sincerely, > > -- Jonas Öberg, Executive Director > Free Software Foundation Europe | jo...@fsfe.org > Your support enables our work (fsfe.org/join) > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > discuss...@lists.fsfellowship.eu > https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion > > > -- > Regards > GTI > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
