Ok, thank you for your help. I had a look at the eguile file for the report
and it calls fmtnumeric for the qty. It looks like that's changed in the
utilities file along the way from:
(define-public (fmtnumeric n)
;; Format gnc-numeric n with as many decimal places as required
(fmtnumber (gnc-numeric-to-double n)))
To:
(define-public (fmtnumber n)
;; Format a number (integer or real) into something printable
(number->string (if (integer? n) (inexact->exact n) n)))
I created a copy of the eguile file in my home directory and pointed my
report to use that, put a call the contents of the old function directly in
place where qty is printed and it now works cleanly.
Here's a diff:
--- /usr/share/gnucash/scm/gnucash/report/taxinvoice.eguile.scm 2020-07-08
10:38:56.578832054 +1000
+++ "/srv/home/aclark/Documents/Account Keeping/taxinvoice.eguile.scm"
2020-07-08 10:39:36.206075678 +1000
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
<?scm )) ?>
<?scm )) ?>
<?scm (if (or units? qty?) (begin ?>
- <td align="right"><?scm:d (fmtnumeric qty) ?></td>
+ <td align="right"><?scm:d (fmtnumber (gnc-numeric-to-double qty))
?></td>
<?scm )) ?>
<?scm (if (or units? qty? discount?) (begin ?>
<td align="right"><?scm:d (fmtmoney currency each) ?></td>
I don't know if that's the best fix or if there's a more suitable function
to be calling there?
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 13:36, Adrien Monteleone <
adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> Sorry, I see that now.
>
> If it was working before, then this would be a change in the report's code.
>
> A bug report on GnuCash’s Bugzilla would be in order.
>
> In the meantime, you could download and ‘borrow’ the report from a
> previous version that worked. If you update before it is fixed, you’ll have
> to keep overwriting the new report with the old.
>
> Another option would be to set up the old report as a custom report. (see
> the wiki on how)
>
> That way, it won’t get overwritten on an update, and when your bug is
> fixed, you can ditch the ‘custom’ old copy.
>
> Finally, it seems this is only the case with the Tax Invoice that I can
> tell. A standard (Easy) invoice report shows decimals.
>
> Other than looks, I’m not even certain of the benefits of the ’tax
> invoice’. For me, there is no tax info on it. But the other invoices do
> have tax info –odd that is.
>
> Regards,
> Adrien
>
> > On Jul 1, 2020 w27d183, at 9:25 PM, Andrew Clark <ajfcl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I misspoke in my previous.
> >
> > That setting is already in place, but this isn't a price.
> >
> > It's an actual amount that really should be decimal. Saying I'm billing
> for 171/2 hours work is confusing.
> >
> > It shows in both the Tax Invoice report and the Australian Tax Invoice
> report.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
>
--
Cheers,
Andrew.
--- /usr/share/gnucash/scm/gnucash/report/taxinvoice.eguile.scm 2020-07-08 10:38:56.578832054 +1000
+++ "/srv/home/aclark/Documents/Account Keeping/taxinvoice.eguile.scm" 2020-07-08 10:39:36.206075678 +1000
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
<?scm )) ?>
<?scm )) ?>
<?scm (if (or units? qty?) (begin ?>
- <td align="right"><?scm:d (fmtnumeric qty) ?></td>
+ <td align="right"><?scm:d (fmtnumber (gnc-numeric-to-double qty)) ?></td>
<?scm )) ?>
<?scm (if (or units? qty? discount?) (begin ?>
<td align="right"><?scm:d (fmtmoney currency each) ?></td>
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
