If that is the thread I’m thinking of, that was my first foray into the inspector and GTK-based CSS. I was going for specificity at the time.
'notebook tab/tabs' is more specific, but I don’t see tab anywhere else as a node, so is probably unnecessary. However, I just realized the options/preferences dialogs use tabs physically and I see they have tab/tabs nodes as well *and* those tabs have an ascendant ’notebook’ so using it won’t help. I just fired up the inspector and see that the there are classes “GncMainWindow” and “GncOptionsDialog” respectively. So adjust the declaration to something like: .GncMainWindow tabs, .GncMainWindow tab {} Which will not apply the styling to the options dialogs also. Unless that is what you intend, but I just found it does make the options tabs harder to read. Additional outlining or color styling might be necessary. Regards, Adrien > On Jan 4, 2020 w1d4, at 8:01 PM, D <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Adrien, > > I'm intrigued. You have given the relevant css nodes simply as "tab" off > "tabs". The earlier thread that I cited had the nodes as "notebook tab" and > "notebook tabs". Has the css been changed, are these different elements, or > does the difference not matter, I wonder? > > David T. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.