If that is the thread I’m thinking of, that was my first foray into the 
inspector and GTK-based CSS. I was going for specificity at the time.

'notebook tab/tabs' is more specific, but I don’t see tab anywhere else as a 
node, so is probably unnecessary.

However, I just realized the options/preferences dialogs use tabs physically 
and I see they have tab/tabs nodes as well *and* those tabs have an ascendant 
’notebook’ so using it won’t help.

I just fired up the inspector and see that the there are classes 
“GncMainWindow” and “GncOptionsDialog” respectively.

So adjust the declaration to something like:

.GncMainWindow tabs, .GncMainWindow tab {}

Which will not apply the styling to the options dialogs also. Unless that is 
what you intend, but I just found it does make the options tabs harder to read. 
Additional outlining or color styling might be necessary.


Regards,
Adrien
> On Jan 4, 2020 w1d4, at 8:01 PM, D <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Adrien,
> 
> I'm intrigued. You have given the relevant css nodes simply as "tab" off 
> "tabs". The earlier thread that I cited had the nodes as "notebook tab" and 
> "notebook tabs". Has the css been changed, are these different elements, or 
> does the difference not matter, I wonder?
> 
> David T.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to