I haven’t yet delved into my 2020 budget, but certainly, the lack of an overall total should be restored as it is critical to the budgeting process.
I consider this a regression of sorts. (in terms of reduced functionality, not necessarily, the return of a previously solved bug) Was this an accident? Oversight? Intentional design? Regards, Adrien > On Jan 2, 2020 w1d2, at 3:43 PM, Greg W <allrightn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the most recent release this change was made: > > [gnc-budget-view.c] totals - 5 fundamental types > previous showed income/expense/transfers/totals budget totals, of uncertain > meaning. now shows income/expense/asset/liability/equity budget totals. The > 5 lines also become sensitive to the global sign-reverse property. > > That change removed the "total" row from budgets making it very hard to > ensure that budgets are balanced or that there are no unallocated funds. > Example of the old behavior: > > Income: 100 > Expenses: 30 > Liabilities: 20 > Assets: 10 > Total: 40 > > Using that total row I could tell there were 40 units that needed allocated > somewhere. How can I accomplish this given the recent changes? If I make a > change and accidentally allocate 1000 to Assets in the new version it just > updates the assets total row and doesn't otherwise indicate the budget is > out of balance. > > Thanks, > Greg _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
