I'm pretty sure that this code isn't making sizing decisions based on readability-- at least not in my experience. It is perfectly happy to cram huge amounts of data into tiny on screen areas... Percentages default to 100%, but remember previously stored values.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 13:24, Adrien Monteleone<adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: I could see how more actual slices (regardless of how many accounts were chosen) would maybe trigger a larger size than a really small one specified for readability. But still, that should be only a default behavior and should not override a specified size. I think yes, the percentage is based on the width of the ‘printable’ area of the report. (and it looks like the default is 100% or else it just remembers what I used last) Regards, Adrien > On Aug 13, 2019, at 2:45 AM, David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > I will try using percentages, although why a percentage (based off what? > Window dimensions?) would be more reliable is beyond my ability to > comprehend. > > > As for number of slices, they all are set to the same value; it's just that > the number of matching accounts is limited. Again, why that would affect > overall pie size goes beyond my comprehension. > > > David > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
