Derek, I think you have defined the reason that the term 'split' should remain in use as it presently is in GNUcash.
On 3/22/2019 2:00 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
You are confusing the VERB split -- the act of splitting two things into pieces -- and the NOUN split, which are the results of the splitting. While you are correct that a simple transaction has been split(v) only once, that does not imply that it is made of one one split(n). It is absolutely reasonable to use the same word to mean (slightly) different things as a verb and as a noun. It's also quite clear from context (at least most of the time) whether you are using split(v) or split(n).
_______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
