Thank you Adrien. That was useful information. Happy New Year,
DaveW On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:44:04 -0600 Adrien Monteleone <adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: > DaveW, > > As noted earlier, receiving copies of your own messages is a > preference you can set. It defaults to ’no’ because many people keep > copies of their own sent mail, thus our mail clients thread our sent > messages into the conversation where they belong. (when using thread > or conversation view features of mail clients, otherwise a check of > the ’sent’ folder will show it.) If you either don’t keep your own > sent mail, or want to get another copy from the list anyway, simply > log in to mailman and set that preference. > > If you just occasionally want to make sure one of your postings made > it to the list, you can check the web archive and see it there. > > If your message fails at the server level, you’ll get a bounce > message. > > If it is held for moderation, (such as accidentally sending from a > different account) you’ll get an automated reply to that effect. > > Regards, > Adrien > > > On Dec 31, 2018, at 12:23 AM, DaveW <wasserlan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > David C > > > > I apologise for the duplicated messages. (I was troubled by the > > fact that I saw no evidence in the List that my message was > > properly sent. Even now, I don't seem to be receiving my gnu-cash > > user copies from the List? Be that as it may, I regret the nuisance > > value of my emailing dilemma.) > > > > Thank you very much for the very helpful comments you provided. I > > now understand it is imperative to make/correct the account > > assignment during the wizard process. (As an aside, that the > > wizard doesn't show the $ amount on the appropriate page, often > > makes it difficult to recall where the transaction belongs. Just > > by way of comment.) > > > > All of that said, it seems that I should await, or install, version > > 3.x > > > > Thank you again Dave and a Happy New Year to you and this user > > group. It is an excellent facility. > > > > Dave W > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 02:56:05 -0600 > > David Carlson <david.carlson....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Dave W, > >> > >> Once is enough with the duplicated messages. The previous > >> responses by John and Derek seemed to cover your concerns but > >> since you are asking for elaboration, I as an experienced user can > >> answer your questions #1 & #2. The QIF Import wizard in the > >> GnuCash Releases 2.6.21 and earlier assign the unspecified account > >> when there is not enough history detected by the Bayesian matcher > >> to assign an existing account to a transaction. The user must > >> monitor the import and correct those transactions during the > >> import process as well as catching and correcting any other > >> assignment errors arising from similar transactions in the history > >> before accepting the assignments in the import. Since each > >> financial institution structures their descriptions somewhat > >> differently, it sometimes takes much more history to get better > >> accuracy with the matching. Even after many years using the OFX > >> importer, I still get frequent mis-assignments between gasoline > >> purchases and restaurant purchases in one of my bank accounts. In > >> my experience, the OFX import wizard historically has given me > >> better results than the QIF importer, and I have few accounts that > >> do not offer OFX format. > >> > >> To make things more interesting, the 3.x release series has the > >> importers re-configured to work differently so that it is, as a > >> practical matter, necessary to start over with matching once you > >> have migrated to that release series. The bright side of that > >> change is that it should work better fairly quickly, and best of > >> all, it will be easier to purge out bad history when needed. > >> > >> I cannot answer your questions #3 and #4. > >> > >> David C > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:29 PM DaveW <wasserlan...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 19:13:53 -0500 > >>> Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.fremont.ca.us> writes: > >>>> > >>>>>> On Dec 3, 2018, at 6:06 AM, David wasserman > >>>>>> <wasserlan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Running Ubuntu 18.04. GNC version 2.6.19. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Whereas GNC remembers previous account allocation on my > >>>>>> Mastercard. Importing from my recently new AMEX credit card, > >>>>>> the system doesn't remember the account allocation even for > >>>>>> exactly the same transaction multiple times previously booked. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> How to fix, please? > >>>>> > >>>>> Keep importing. It takes several runs of the importer to build > >>>>> up enough matching data to generate matches, and it’s runs of > >>>>> the matcher that matter, not the number of transactions in an > >>>>> import. > >>>> > >>>> Keep in mind that the QIF importer matches on FULL LINES. If > >>>> there is even a single character different in the Payee or Memo > >>>> then the QIF importer will consider it different. > >>>> > >>>>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > >>>>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > >>>> > >>>> -derek > >>> > >>> Ongoing . . . . . > >>> > >>> I have now been through 8 monthly iterations of my newer Amex qif > >>> importations. Still no auto account allocation generation as > >>> suggested will eventually occur. (Yet my long-term Mastercard > >>> account .qif downloads continue to import and allocate correctly.) > >>> > >>> In my frenetic searching, I find this > >>> file: /.gnucash/qif-accounts-map. It seems to be the memory source > >>> of previous transaction. It's a long file that obviously has > >>> followed me over the years. In it I recognise that, typically, > >>> the Mastercard allocations Line Description has the correct > >>> account allocation recorded. > >>> > >>> So I searched a recent Amex transaction that has twice previously > >>> been manually corrected from "Unspecified" to it's correct Expense > >>> account yet this is what is recorded inter alia: > >>> ("ROMEO S FOODHALL SUTHER SUTHERLAND" "ROMEO S FOODHALL SUTHER > >>> SUTHERLAND" (9 8 0 3 4 2 11 12 5 6) #f "Unspecified" #f #t). > >>> > >>> Sorry about the long preamble. ): > >>> > >>> *1. Once designated "Unspecified" how/when, and by what means, > >>> does the correct allocation be recorded? > >>> *2. Is there a difference between manual correction while in QIF > >>> Download mode and after Import has been completed? > >>> *3. What do the numerals and #'s mean? > >>> *4. Shall I upload the said qif-accounts-map file for you? > >>> > >>> Dave W > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> gnucash-user mailing list > >>> gnucash-user@gnucash.org > >>> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > >>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > >>> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > >>> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > >>> ----- > >>> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > >>> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnucash-user mailing list > > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > > ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.