From my understanding, adding an option to the 3.x series means that anyone who upgrades to 3.3, creates a saved-report, and downgrades to 3.2 will suddenly find the saved-report will crash instead of downgrading gracefully. So, any new option must be very carefully considered. General bug fixing can, and should be done anytime however.
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, 13:00 David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I don’t understand your assertion that this would be an “incompatible > change of options.” The option to remove hyperlinks is available on the > Balance Sheet, but not on the Transaction Report. What about that is > incompatible? > > If I were going to put the option anywhere, I’d put it in the same place > that the Balance Sheet puts it: on the Display tab. > > FWIW, the presence of this setting on the Balance Sheet options > demonstrates: a) that someone thought it useful to give the option on a > GnuCash report, and b) that it’s been done before and might be done again. > As a non-programmer, I thought that pointing to an existing similar feature > might ease the process of implementation. It sounds as if I were wrong, and > I apologize for assuming work for you. > > David T. > > On Aug 16, 2018, at 8:31 PM, Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Um. It's historical. And nobody has requested removing links in amounts > loudly enough to warrant an incompatible change of options. If there is > demand, in which tab should the option reside? > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, 00:47 David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Christopher, >> >> Is there some reason why the Transaction report doesn’t have the option >> to display as hyperlinks, as I see for accounts under the Balance Sheet >> report (Options->Display->Display accounts as hyperlinks)? >> >> Forcing a user to edit style sheets to achieve this in one report, while >> offering it as a clickable option in another seems capricious. >> >> David T. >> >> > On Aug 16, 2018, at 3:07 AM, Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Nancy, welcome to Gnucash user list! >> > >> > You can disable links but it's not obvious in the transaction report. >> > You'll need to modify the style sheet used (edit menu) then reload the >> > transaction report. >> > >> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, 16:55 Nancy Tague <nancyta...@centurytel.net> >> wrote: >> > >> >> I’m a brand new GnuCash user trying to figure out its features. This >> one >> >> has me stumped. The numbers in transaction reports show as blue and >> >> underlined – they’re links to the register. Is there a way to turn >> that >> >> off? I don’t want my reports to have blue underlined numbers. Thanks >> for >> >> your help. >> >> >> >> Nancy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> gnucash-user mailing list >> >> gnucash-user@gnucash.org >> >> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: >> >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user >> >> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see >> >> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. >> >> ----- >> >> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. >> >> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > gnucash-user mailing list >> > gnucash-user@gnucash.org >> > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: >> > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user >> > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see >> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. >> > ----- >> > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. >> > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. >> >> > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
