> On Aug 15, 2018, at 10:59 AM, David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> Additionally, the comparison table might serve better with each SQL backend >> represented, since that’s the next question for someone contemplating that >> route. And in that case, sqlite does not necessarily require additional >> software, or expertise with a DBMS. (it’s included in the default >> distribution of the software on Mac and Linux, you just have to choose it on >> save, and you don’t really need to know how it works, unlike the other two.) >> Finally, perhaps presenting the table as a list of features/factors with >> check marks or Xs, could be easier to scan and digest. > > I’ll look into this modification as well. >
Now that I ponder it more, perhaps your original version of the table is best for simplicity. Can the docs point to the wiki? In that case, maybe reference the SQL page instead for those who want to find more info. Regards, Adrien _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
