It is my understanding that 2.6.21 is the only 2.6.x that is compatible
with the 3.2 data structure. I have used 2.6.21 successfully with 3.2
data, but older 2.6.x report that they are not compatible. I believe
that is true of xml and sql databases. Mike
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Thomas Forrester
<tlforres...@gmail.com> wrote:
On a Windows computer, I upgraded to 3.2 from 2.6.20 I think it was
back
when I first noticed version 3 had been released. Took me till 3.2 to
notice, but I think it was within a few days of the 3.2 release
Having now used 3.2 for a short while, I'm wondering if there's any
issue
with going back to 2.6.x? In other words, are there any underlying
data
structure changes, or other file changes, that would make this a huge
mistake? I am using the MySQL database backend.
I just feel at this point that, if I can't further edit anything after
pasting something in from the clipboard, that it may be a better idea
to go
back so I can go forward.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
