I didn’t realize there were so many such dialogs!

Looking them over now, I’d think setting the value to “8” would leave some room 
for future flexibility and this appears to be doable based on the size of most 
tabs. (this would vary with very long strings, perhaps considering German, it 
might be better to leave the max at “6”)
It looks like the Import/Export and Online Banking setup dialogs are different 
in that they force the user to step through each tab in order. Normally, tabs 
should not depend on or affect settings in other tabs. (or the dialog should be 
re-arranged) Since this is the case with those dialogs, it seems either they’ve 
been specially designed, or they are using a different gtk element to force the 
progression through tabs rather than let the user jump around.

I see some room for improvement here as well. Adding numerals before the label 
of each tab in these ‘ordered-tab-dialogs’ would make the fact that you have to 
go in order a bit more obvious. (I tried to jump around, and only when I 
couldn’t did I notice the ’Next’ button which clued me in)

Additionally, it seems the Import Bills/Invoice and the Customers/Vendors 
dialogs are intended to operate the same way, but simply haven’t been 
transitioned to the other format. (which I personally think is the better 
design as it forces the user to enter required information in order.)

If those last two changes aren’t something you’ll be dealing with, I’ll just 
file bug reports/RFE’s on them.

Thanks for your work!

Regards,
Adrien

> On Jul 17, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Di Mang <di.mang.freet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> <GnuCash - Dialogs with GtkNotebooks.ods>


_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to