Of course, one could embed prefixes in account names to force a particular sort order, e.g., "1.0 Assets" "2.0 Liabilities" "3.0 Expenses", etc. David
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:55, Adrien Monteleone<adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: They should be sorted by alpha. I’m not sure you can change that. (easily) I have a book using account numbers, but those don’t seem to affect the sort order. I also don’t see any preference for using another method. Regards, Adrien > On Jul 17, 2018, at 12:47 AM, Alex Mak <chikinking...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Gnucash team > > I would like to know how to change the order of the account list in the > pull-down menu during transaction register ? Seem some of the account is > not well ordered. > > Regards > Alex Mak > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see > https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
