It only takes a few seconds on my low end linux box which is also about 6 yrs old. It takes 25 sec to be completely up and most of that time is loading the data file.

On 08/06/2017 04:50 PM, Greg Feneis wrote:
Also FWIW, I just started GnuCash V...16 (not quite the latest) on my 6
year old Win 7 laptop and it only took 25 Seconds to get to where it begins
loading the data file.  While a lot of my programs take between 2 and 5
seconds to load, I do have a few that take quite a bit longer to load than
GnuCash does (programing, simulation, cad environments, etc.).
​
Are other folks having a significantly longer wait than 25 Seconds for
GnuCash to go from start to begin loading of data file?

Kind regards,

Greg Feneis



On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, aegross <aegr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On zondag 6 augustus 2017 16:46:24 CEST Sam McCoy wrote:
    Gentlemen:

    I have noticed the time it takes to load all the modules when starting
    up Gnu Cash.
FWIW, I have anecdotally noticed that by far the longest module required to
load is Finance::Quote, which strictly speaking, is not GnuCash code.

Regards,
AEG





--
View this message in context: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.
nabble.com/Suggestion-tp4693076p4693081.html
Sent from the GnuCash - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to