John,

I'm still working it.  It appears to me that both algorithms may have gone a bit awry sometime ago although the "average price" may be okay.  Specifically, the initial comm-list entry became an else case which meant it needed to perform the assignments and, in the "average cost", the sign handling doesn't

My WAG was just that.  Just a quick check to see if I was in the right area.


Regards,

Sherlock

On 8/24/25 9:16 AM, John Ralls wrote:
 Sherlock,

What’s this part for? It seems irrelevant to Chang Wang’s example as that doesn’t use trading accounts:
-
-       ;; However skip splits in trading accounts as these counterbalance
-       ;; the actual value and share amounts back to zero
-       ((eqv? (xaccAccountGetType (xaccSplitGetAccount (car comm-splits)))
-              ACCT-TYPE-TRADING)
-        (loop (cdr comm-splits)
-              sumlist))
I guess you did a bisect to arrive at the 2019 change date. There were 8 changes to gnc-commodity-utils.scm that day. Which one was the culprit?

Regards,
John Ralls


On Aug 23, 2025, at 20:18, Sherlock Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

I concur.

There are significant differences in the implementation between gnc:get-exchange-totals and gnc:get-exchange-cost-totals that I believe are the root cause of the issue.  These differences appear to date back to May 3, 2019.    As a WAG, I modified gnc:get-exchange-cost-totals to match gnc:get-exchange-totals in the attached patch and the issue you've raised appears to be resolved.  I have not done any further testing,

Regards,

Sherlock


On 8/23/25 2:20 PM, Chang Wang wrote:
Thanks for the reminder. I'll post to the user list in the future.
However, in the above example, there is no gain or loss due to currency exchange as the exchange rates are set to 1 so no currency gain/loss needs to be booked. And the price source is set to be Last up through report date instead of average cost. Therefore, I think these are different issues.

On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 3:51 PM John Ralls <[email protected]> wrote:

    Oddly I just told somebody on IRC the same answer:
    https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797796

    Unless you’re willing to submit a PR, this is a user-list topic,
    so in the future please use gnucash-user instead of gnucash-devel.

    Regards,
    John Ralls

    > On Aug 23, 2025, at 1:43 PM, Chang Wang
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > Hi all,
    > I noticed an issue with the Trial Balance report when using
    stock trading and multiple currencies. Even when transactions
    are balanced, the Trial Balance report appears to break due to
    incorrect calculation of unrealized gains.
    >
    > I've attached an uncompressed minimal example to illustrate
    the problem.
    >
    > Steps to reproduce:
    > Open the attached book.
    > Generate a Trial Balance report with reporting currency set to
    USD, price source set to Last up through report date, and enable
    Show Foreign Currencies and Exchange Rates.
    >
    > Observed behavior:
    > The report shows an Unrealized Gain of $20,800, which is
    incorrect.
    >
    > Expected behavior:
    > The Unrealized Gain should be $200.
    >
    > Explanation:
    > The example contains three transactions:
    > 1) 08/02/2025 - Buy one stock for 10,200 JPY.
    > 2) 08/03/2025 - Exchange 100,000 JPY for 100,000 USD.
    > 3) 08/04/2025 - Buy one stock for 10,400 JPY.
    >
    > The JPY/USD rate is fixed at 1 on all days, so there should be
    no realized or unrealized currency gains. Stock prices are set
    at 10X00 JPY on 08/0X/2025, where X = 1, 2, 3, 4.
    >
    > Therefore, in USD reporting currency, the Trial Balance should
    show unrealized gains as:
    > (10,400 * 2) - 10,200 - 10,400 = 200 JPY = 200 USD
    >
    > Notably, the Balance Sheet report does display the correct
    unrealized gain. And if transaction 3) or transaction 2) is
    removed, the Trial Balance turns out to be correct.
    >
    > I'm not familiar with Scheme, so I wasn't able to locate the
    problem in the source code. I also wasn't able to file a bug on
    Bugzilla, since the registration function appears to be broken.
    >
    > Thanks for your attention,
    > Chang
    > <tb.gnucash>_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to