Out of idle curiosity (since I'm not actively working on these things any 
more), are these changes applying to the docs platform as well? 

And are there mechanisms that can prevent the sporadic developer who might have 
an existing clone locally from pushing to these outdated branches? I imagine 
that there are many clones out there in the hands of such intermittent 
developers.

Also, ISTR that there are extensive instruction guides to development on the 
wiki. I'll hope that those will get appropriate updates to reflect the new 
naming conventions...

⁣David T. ​

On Mar 27, 2023, 2:54 AM, at 2:54 AM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote:
>I've created new `stable` branches in gnucash.git and gnucash-docs.git
>and changed Github's default branch to them. This is effectively a
>rename of master; when Derek has time he'll delete the master branches
>from code and Github.
>
>You can modify your local repositories with:
>git branch -D maint
>git branch -m master stable
>git fetch origin
>git branch -u origin/stable stable
>git remote set-head origin -a
>
>and optionally to clean things up:
>git remote prune origin
>
>Please do this ASAP to avoid inadvertently pushing anything to maint or
>master!
>
>Regards,
>John Ralls
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnucash-devel mailing list
>gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
>https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to