Wish to canvas opinion on what is considered best practice for the following real-data simulations, for rebuilding owner-report and aging-report. This illustrates current buggy behaviour.
* I have a $100 customer invoice, posted- and due-dates 6 weeks ago. * I have a $50 credit-note to same customer, posted and due-dates are 2 weeks ago. Intuitively the customer owes $50. But I haven't formally yet linked the credit-note to the invoice though. The $100 invoice is still unpaid Attachments show: * the Customer Report counts the $100 and $50 separately into separate owing date ranges. * the Receivables Aging report shows the CN $50 was automatically used to fund the $100 invoice, via FIFO (paying oldest invoice first). Which behaviour should we standardise on? [image: image.png] [image: image.png]
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
