On 24/02/2019 17:08, Geert Janssens wrote:
You do like misinterpreting other peoples words to your benefit...
Only if necessary. I have never seen you like this before.
I never said it was a requirement to get gnc implemented on Windows. I said
gnucash chose to better integrate with each platform.
mixed words, no argument from me. The 2.x to 3.x changes affected all
platforms I am aware of, see the start of the thread.
And please re-read my other message. We're talking in different contexts. You
continue to discuss on the level of what should be considered metadata and
what should be part of the gnucash data itself.
Are you saying my understanding of metadata is wrong? If so we can
certainly discuss that in another thread.
I'm only talking default
metadata locations itself
I've seen this before, you are narrowing the available space you might
be responsible for.
Doesn't work for me, Geert.
as that's the only aspect in this context that has
changed in gnucash 3.x. That some data should not be considered metadata is
not under debate. We agree on that.
Oh...kay
help me to understand what you think is and isn't gnc's responsibility.
You don't give a donder about reports, right? They're just occasional drek.
It doesn't matter to you that someone took months getting a budget
together and producing a report on that budget to satisfy their
Trustees. You thought it was a good idea to just move a whole bunch of
stuff to someone else's computer leaving no trace of the work behind.
The thing that pisses me off is that you appear to be defending this
harmful decision rather than apologizing.
I have never in all my years of work with gnc seen you behave like this
before, Geert, it seems to me you are running backwards faster than your
legs will work.
--
Wm
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
