Thank you Stephen for your results. It would seem that the test-transaction failure is caused by a faulty libicu-dev whereas my failure caused by some other issue related to Time zones.
C On Sun., 27 Jan. 2019, 09:55 Stephen M. Butler <kg...@arrl.net wrote: > On 1/26/19 3:13 AM, Christopher Lam wrote: > > Another experiment. Try prefix your build with "TZ=UTC " on current > > maint. > > > > Eg if using ninja, it'll be "TZ=UTC ninja check" > > > TZ=UTC dpkg- -rfakeroot -b -uc > > .... > > End testing: Jan 27 01:47 UTC > + exit 2 > debian/rules:65: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed > make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/steve/Projects/GnuCash/gnucash' > debian/rules:24: recipe for target 'build' failed > make: *** [build] Error 2 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit > status 2 > > Same error -- Test 109 that fails. > > > This is with the patches for 3.4. I verified before Sabbath that 3.4 > builds and passes the tests. Tried your test first thing this evening > after git checkout maint and git pull. I am at 3.4-43-g84d1c3645 which > builds but doesn't pass the tests. So, I could build turning off the > test step. > > However, Friday I was learning more about git bisect to see if I could > figure out which patch caused the tests to start failing. However, a > couple of items got in the way: 1--time; 2--some commits don't build. > That messed me up a bit. So, I may start over again with the bisect > (just for my own edification) and see what happens. Maybe this time > I'll do a git describe each time and take notes so I'll be a little more > cognizant of what I'm learning. <<did that make sense>> > > > --Steve (in the dark) > > > > > On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 11:52 Stephen M. Butler <kg...@arrl.net > > <mailto:kg...@arrl.net> wrote: > > > > On 1/24/19 7:36 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: > > > Revert is a git terminology, not a gnucash one. Welcome to version > > > control. > > > > That's the manual to which I referred. It meant something else to my > > mind when I first saw your post. But, after further thought, my > > previous thought was faulty. > > > > > > My first boss after college would draw a picture to describe the > > difference between a bug and a feature. > > > > I can't draw so a word will have to do (at less than a thousand > > words)! > > > > BUG: draw stick figure. > > > > > > FEATURE: Add pants, tie, gloves, shoes and a top hat. > > > > > > MORAL: A feature is a bug all dressed up and ready to go out. > > > > > > > > Please remember this revert is reverting a buggy code with a > > previous > > > buggy code, so, cannot be consisted safe to package; best wait > until > > > the clever devs can find a proper fix for gnc-date. > > > > > > On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 05:46 Stephen M. Butler <kg...@arrl.net > > <mailto:kg...@arrl.net> > > > <mailto:kg...@arrl.net <mailto:kg...@arrl.net>> wrote: > > > > > > OH! Light bulb on! > > > OK. I understand what you said earlier. I'll put the patches > > > back into > > > the packaging. > > > > > > Thanks for clearing that up. > > > > > > --Steve > > > > > > PS Looking in manual for 'revert' command. > > > > > > > -- > > Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM > > stephen.m.butle...@gmail.com <mailto:stephen.m.butle...@gmail.com> > > kg...@arrl.net <mailto:kg...@arrl.net> > > 253-350-0166 > > ------------------------------------------- > > GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8 > > > > > > -- > Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM > stephen.m.butle...@gmail.com > kg...@arrl.net > 253-350-0166 > ------------------------------------------- > GnuPG Fingerprint: 8A25 9726 D439 758D D846 E5D4 282A 5477 0385 81D8 > > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
