On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:49:05 +0800 Christopher Lam <christopher....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Liz > > Thank you for experiments - this confirms that doing a proper > reconciliation report is *difficult* > > Please experiment further (1) expand dates eg from 01/01/1980 to > 01/01/2099 (2) let me know the characteristics of the 77 missing > amounts > - are they unreconciled/cleared/reconciled? > > I guess you can build from source, would you care to try > https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-scheme-progress-and-reconcile-header > > which will add a reconcile-report header? > > I'm fully aware this report is currently incomplete and will need > further refinements. For instance IMHO the primary sortkey should be > frozen to 'reconciled status'. > > I'd be keen to discuss further to shape it into a proper report. > > C > > Expanded date took a few goes with the system altering the date I typed - I had to use the calendar to enforce my requests. So, expanding the period into the future (01/01/2043 I got to) makes no change. Making the start date prior to the start of the file (01/01/1980) shows all the transactions, as it should. So with some experimentation A start date up to 31/08/2018 shows reconciled and unreconciled transactions A start date of 01/09/2018 shows unreconciled only. Building another package will follow. Liz _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
