John Ralls-2 wrote > None of the core devs have had time to look into application bundles for > Linux. Since the Windows and Mac bundles also have pretty much all of the > dependency libraries and associated data in them I imagine that a Flatpack > or similar would run to about the same size, 120-180MB.
Great. I've opened a request / discussion thread at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796019. I think this might be a convenient option as quite a few users have mentioned that they can't find a current version of GnuCash in their distribution repositories and need to build it themselves. While I have nothing against building software, I find it unnecessary for an ordinary user to download development tools and libraries. Especially now that a few technologies exist to allow convenient binary packages. In any case, the topic is open. Let's see if we can get something rolling automatically. -- Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
