Op maandag 29 januari 2018 17:42:01 CET schreef David T. via gnucash-devel: > Hello, > > More on the two Git pages (“Git” and “An Introduction to Git”)(Thanks, > Geert!). > > I notice that “An Introduction to Git” says that there are 2 important > branches: master and maint, whereas “Git” says that there are three: > master, maint, and unstable, with the note that unstable only exists when a > new major release is imminent. I will assume that the latter is more right > (insofar as it goes into more technical detail about the git branching that > the project uses), but should the Intro page be changed to be more in line > with the main Git page? Something like this: > > There are two primary branches in the GnuCash repositories: > master > is the default branch in git. New features and their documentation should > be based on this branch. maint > is the second important branch. Bugfixes, translations, and improvements > to the documentation should usually be applied on this branch. > > A third branch, unstable will exist when a major release is imminent, but is > used for beta releases. > > Cheers, > David > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
David, Thanks for reviewing this. Yes, I would keep this information similar on both pages. I think new contributors would probably be very confused if the pages didn't state the same and not know which one to believe. Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
