Ok but then it will be semi-backward incompatible as it will be only compatible with 2.6.20 which can make it very tricky for users to test 2.8 and then go back to an old gnucash (if needed) < 2.6.20 the user has using before, no ? On piecash side, both formats can be supported so it is more for gnucash users than piecash users I am worried.
On Dec 21, 2017 3:57 PM, "John Ralls" <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > On Dec 21, 2017, at 1:27 AM, Alen Siljak <alen.sil...@gmx.com> wrote: > > To get back to Sebastien's question: this does seem like a breaking change at this stage. Going back to 2.6.19 with the database where a few transactions have been entered in 2.7.2 shows the dates as 1970-01-01. That’s a significant problem that I’ll have to fix in 2.6.20. Please file a bug report. Thanks. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
