On donderdag 31 augustus 2017 16:17:20 CEST Aaron Laws wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> > wrote: > > I meant to add still, if we want to keep guile 1.8 support, the > > FIND_PACKAGE(GUILE_EXECUTABLE...) rules should move up inside the > > branches of > > the GUILE2 vs GUILE1 test. > > For GUILE2 it can remain > > FIND_PROGRAM (GUILE_EXECUTABLE guile2.0 guile) > > IF (NOT GUILE_EXECUTABLE) > > > > MESSAGE (SEND_ERROR "The guile executable was not found, but is > > required. > > > > Please set GUILE_EXECUTABLE.") > > ENDIF (NOT GUILE_EXECUTABLE) > > > > For guile 1.8 it should become > > FIND_PROGRAM (GUILE_EXECUTABLE guile1.8 guile) > > IF (NOT GUILE_EXECUTABLE) > > > > MESSAGE (SEND_ERROR "The guile executable was not found, but is > > required. > > > > Please set GUILE_EXECUTABLE.") > > ENDIF (NOT GUILE_EXECUTABLE) > > > > Regards, > > > > Geert > > I don't have guile 1. guile --version; returns "2.2.2" and guile2.0 > --version; returns "2.0.14".
Yes, distributions shift this all the time... I'm still on Fedora 25 which has guile (being 2.0.13) and guile1.8 (being 1.8.8) While checking these version numbers I saw the copyright notice on guile 1.8 was last updated in 2008(!) and guile 2.0 in 2016. I think it's fair to state guile 1.8 is getting rather outdated and I'll keep my vote to stop supporting it ASAP :) Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
