I'm a fan of the IDEs produced by JetBrains (RubyMine, PyCharm, et al.) but admit upfront that I have not worked with their tracking product, YouTrack. Worth a look though? Free hosting for open source projects.
Bug and Issue Tracking overview https://www.jetbrains.com/youtrack/features/issue_tracking.html Searching for Issues video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzkKcG7KIhI&index=23&list=PLQ176FUIyIUbGE728KezWz1J15fHW0S_m Import from Bugzilla https://www.jetbrains.com/help/youtrack/incloud/7.0/Import-from-Bugzilla.html Free Open Source licensing https://www.jetbrains.com/buy/opensource/?product=youtrack other Demos and Screencasts https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQ176FUIyIUbGE728KezWz1J15fHW0S_m Eric On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:56 PM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > As I think everyone knows, we use bugzilla.gnome.org < > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/> for bug and enhancement tracking. > > There's a new banner on every BZ page saying that Gnome plans to drop > Bugzilla and the CGit repository browser, replacing them with Gitlab. > > That isn't going to work for us. I don't think it's going to work for > Gnome, either, because a bug tracker that can't do word searches isn't > capable of managing thousands of open bugs (https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ > user/search/index.html <https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/search/index.html>), > but that's not our problem. Our problem is that with our repository not at > git.gnome.org <http://git.gnome.org/> there won't be a GnuCash project in > GitLab and so there won't be a bug tracker. We'll need to get a new one. > > Since we do mirror our repos to Github it is a viable option and it does > at least have better search facilities (or at least they're better > documented) that Gitlab, see https://help.github.com/ > articles/searching-issues-and-pull-requests/ <https://help.github.com/ > articles/searching-issues-and-pull-requests/>. It lacks many other > features of BZ: All categorization and status tracking is by "labels" and > they have no inherent hierarchy or organization. > > So I think we're going to need our own bugtracker. > > BZ is Free and it should be fairly simple to get the Gnome bug team to > ship us a dump of our part of the database and set up a redirect once we > have our instance up and running. The web display on whatever it is that > GNU uses (e.g. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=guile < > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=guile>) but I dislike that it is > operated entirely by email. Mantis is popular but is managed by a bug list. > It's filterable to a fare-thee-well but lacks controlled vocabularies on > many of its fields so managing a large number of open bugs is a PITA. RT > (used by perl's CPAN) is also completely email driven. Trac is a little > less rudimentary than Github--it at least has categories and status fields, > but I don't believe it's capable of managing thousands of bugs. > SourceForge's built in tracker is on the same level as Github's with less > capable search. > > There's a sort of conceptual timeline on the DevelopmentInfrastructure > page but nothing concrete. I'd guess we have at least several months and > perhaps as long as a year to have a replacement up and running. > > Regards, > John Ralls > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
